... adequately reasoned. Court admittedly found that defendant and his co-perpetrators planned to commit theft in
Search Results for: Supreme Court Cassation
- Popular keywords:
- Objection DNA collection criminal lawyer
- Theft criminal lawyer
- Grace criminal lawyer
- Supreme Court Cassation criminal lawyer
- Drugs criminal lawyer
- OM hearing criminal lawyer
- Fraud and money laundering criminal lawyer
- Multiple criminal chamber criminal lawyer
- Penitentiary law criminal lawyer
- Review at the Supreme Court criminal lawyer
- Appeal to the Court of Appeals criminal lawyer
- Murder & Manslaughter criminal lawyer
- Deprivation of benefit criminal lawyer
- Remand criminal lawyer
- Traffic Criminal Law criminal lawyer
- Resisting criminal charges criminal lawyer
- Closure of drug premises art. 13b Opium Act criminal lawyer
High Council Reiterates relevant considerations from HR:2019:1146 regarding requirements for proving a case based on art. 9.2 WVW
A 61-year-old man has been cleared of all prosecution by the 's-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal after attempting to kill several people
Did defendant, co-driver of car, know at the time of obtaining car that it was obtained by crime?
The proof
The Hague - The High Council will rule on Tuesday in the case of triple murder suspect Thijs
Benefit by being a director of the escape car to act, art. 189.1.1 Sr. 1. Evidence charge intent. Can only lead to
It has recently emerged that a number of councilsheren is improperly sworn at the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch. This provides opportunities for
Six sentences handed out in the Valkenburg vice case, remain upheld. That has the High Council
... that as to content of evidence used (o.g. Regulation note oral judgment) refers to p-vs of police, confirm, now
From the minutes of the hearings held on appeal show that the suspect is acting on his
Councilsman has requested, pursuant to Art. 4.3.6.3 HR Procesreglement, that p-v be sent. From communications by the clerk of the court of appeal it is not possible to say otherwise.
... apparently construed as request for appointment of expert by session judge or (after referral of case by court) by RC
Court held that at sentencing should be based on the premise that applicable sentence maximum is 15 years and 8 months
Is there impairment in person "in any other way" a.b.i. Art. 6:106.b BW?
HR reiterates relevant considerations from HR:2019:793
Theo van M. (61) does not have to the cell for shooting at members of motorcycle club Bandidos. It came
The penalty justification does not meet the requirements of art. 359.6 Sv and t.a.v. the forfeiture is not
The pleading notes mentioned in this record are missing at the to the High Council sent
Fight between rival motorcycle clubs in Sittard in 2015.
Attempted manslaughter (committed multiple times) by shooting from cafe at man's height
On appeal, the Public Prosecutor's Office has again demanded a prison sentence against Theo van M. from Kerkrade (61). He unloaded